Paradox #1
Hebrews 12:24 speaks about the blood of Jesus speaking a better word than the blood of Abel. Some see a potential contradiction with the idea of God’s justice, as God accepted Abel's sacrifice and acknowledged his righteousness, yet this verse suggests that Jesus' sacrifice surpasses it. This could raise questions about the fairness or consistency in how God values sacrifices and righteousness.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction in Hebrews 12:24 when comparing it to Old Testament laws about sacrifice and atonement. In the Old Testament, the blood of animals was used to atone for sins. However, this verse speaks about a new covenant through Jesus' blood, suggesting a different or superior way of obtaining forgiveness and spiritual cleansing. This could seem like a shift or inconsistency in the method of atonement between the Old and New Testaments.
Paradox #3
Hebrews 12:24 speaks about Jesus and his role as a mediator, contrasting his message with that of Abel's blood, which cried out for justice. A potential contradiction could arise when comparing the themes of justice and forgiveness. Abel's blood is seen as calling for justice or revenge, while Jesus' message emphasizes forgiveness and mercy. This could be seen as conflicting values—justice versus forgiveness—that some might find difficult to reconcile.