Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 1:4
This verse states "One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth forever," suggesting the earth remains unshaken, unlike Hebrews 12:27 which talks about the removal of things that can be shaken.
Ecclesiastes 1:4: [One] generation passeth away, and [another] generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
Contradiction with Psalm 104:5
This verse says "Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever," implying stability of the earth, contrasting with Hebrews 12:27's message of things being removed and shaken.
Psalm 104:5: [Who] laid the foundations of the earth, [that] it should not be removed for ever. [Who...: Heb. He hath founded the earth upon her bases]
Contradiction with Isaiah 45:18
States "For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the Lord; and there is none else," emphasizing permanence, contrasting with removal mentioned in Hebrews 12:27.
Isaiah 45:18: For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:10
This verse describes the heavens passing away and the elements melting, which can be seen as a contradiction as Hebrews 12:27 anticipates a selective shaking and removal, not a complete destruction.
2 Peter 3:10: But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
Paradox #1
Hebrews 12:27 might be seen as conflicting with the idea that God’s creation is permanent or unchanging. If something is to be shaken and removed, it suggests change or instability, which could contradict passages emphasizing the enduring nature of God's creation.
Paradox #2
The verse discusses the shaking of created things to reveal what is unshakable. A scientific perspective might find inconsistency in the idea of physical or metaphysical "shaking" as it suggests an event not supported by physical laws or scientific evidence. Such an event doesn't align with our understanding of natural processes and physics.