Contradiction with Romans 6:14
States that we are not under the law, which could contradict the notion of the law as steadfast in Hebrews 2:2.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Romans 6:15
Suggests grace frees us from the strict penalties of the law, opposing the strict recompense described in Hebrews 2:2.
Romans 6:15: What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:25
Indicates that faith replaces the need for the law, unlike Hebrews 2:2, which emphasizes the law’s binding nature.
Galatians 3:25: But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:18
Asserts that being led by the Spirit liberates one from the law, contradicting the obligatory nature of the law in Hebrews 2:2.
Galatians 5:18: But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Contradiction with James 2:13
States that mercy triumphs over judgment, which could oppose the strict recompense principle in Hebrews 2:2.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with John 1:17
Suggests grace and truth through Jesus Christ supersede the law given by Moses, unlike the binding nature of the law in Hebrews 2:2.
John 1:17: For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
Paradox #1
Hebrews 2:2 discusses the message delivered by angels and how it was legally binding. A possible doctrinal conflict could arise when comparing this with the idea that salvation and the New Covenant come through Jesus, highlighting a shift from the law to grace. The challenge is reconciling the importance and binding nature of the old messages with the new teachings of Jesus. This could create tension for those interpreting the continuity and difference between the Old and New Testaments.