Contradiction with John 10:28-29
These verses promise eternal security of believers, stating that no one can pluck them out of Jesus' hand, contrasting with the idea that those enlightened can fall away.
John 10:28-29: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any [man] pluck them out of my hand.
Contradiction with Romans 8:38-39
These verses affirm that nothing can separate believers from the love of God, contradicting the possibility of falling away suggested in Hebrews 6:4.
Romans 8:38-39: For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
Contradiction with Philippians 1:6
This verse assures that God will complete the good work begun in a believer, conflicting with the notion of falling away after enlightenment.
Philippians 1:6: Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform [it] until the day of Jesus Christ: [perform: or, finish]
Contradiction with Ephesians 1:13-14
These verses discuss the Holy Spirit as a seal of salvation, implying permanency, contradictory to Hebrews 6:4's potential for falling away.
Ephesians 1:13-14: In whom ye also [trusted], after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Contradiction with 1 John 5:13
This verse indicates that believers can know they have eternal life, contrasting with the idea that such assurance could be undone.
1 John 5:13: These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction in the idea that someone who has experienced the blessings of faith might not be able to return to it if they fall away. This seems to conflict with the belief in God’s forgiveness and the possibility of repentance and redemption for everyone.
Paradox #2
Hebrews 6:4 raises questions about whether people who have turned away from their faith can return. This seems to conflict with the idea of forgiveness and redemption found in other parts of the Bible, where it suggests that anyone can be forgiven if they repent. This creates a tension between the idea of eternal security (once saved, always saved) and the possibility of losing one’s salvation.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding Hebrews 6:4 could relate to the interpretation of whether someone who has once been enlightened can fall away from faith and return again. This has sparked debates over the doctrine of eternal security (once saved, always saved) versus the possibility of losing one's salvation. Different Christian denominations interpret this issue in various ways, leading to conflicting views on the theological implications of the verse.
Paradox #4
Some people might see a contradiction in this verse, as it suggests that once someone has experienced certain spiritual gifts or enlightenment, if they fall away or turn away, it is impossible for them to be brought back to repentance. This could be seen as conflicting with the idea of forgiveness and redemption being always available. The belief that some wrongs are unforgivable might not align with other teachings about endless mercy and second chances.