Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
This verse states that Jesus did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it, suggesting the law has a lasting purpose, in contrast to Hebrews 7:11, which implies the insufficiency of the Levitical priesthood and law for perfection.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 7:12
This verse claims the law is holy, just, and good, which may contradict Hebrews 7:11's indication of the Levitical law's inadequacy for achieving perfection.
Romans 7:12: Wherefore the law [is] holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
These verses suggest the law was a tutor leading to Christ and that its role has ended with faith, which seems to contrast with Hebrews 7:11's implication that perfection could not be achieved under the Levitical priesthood.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with Psalms 19:7
This verse describes the law of the Lord as perfect, contrasting with Hebrews 7:11, which highlights a weakness or imperfection in the Levitical priesthood.
Psalms 19:7: The law of the LORD [is] perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD [is] sure, making wise the simple. [law: or, doctrine] [converting: or, restoring]
Paradox #1
The verse mentions the idea of a change in priesthood, which can be seen as inconsistent with the belief that God's plans and institutions are unchanging. In the context of Christianity, this introduces the concept that the old priesthood was insufficient and required replacement by Jesus' eternal priesthood. This can be seen as conflicting with the idea of the original priesthood being divinely instituted and perfect.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict related to Hebrews 7:11 could revolve around the idea of the priesthood. This verse suggests a need for a new type of priesthood beyond the traditional Levitical priesthood. This might appear to contradict the belief that the laws and systems given through Moses, including the priesthood, were complete and sufficient. The introduction of a new priesthood could be seen as suggesting that the old system was inadequate.
Paradox #3
Hebrews 7:11 mentions the idea of perfection through the Levitical priesthood but suggests that perfection was not achieved through it, leading to the need for a new kind of priest. The contradiction or conflict here could be that the Old Testament often describes the Levitical priesthood as God-ordained and divinely instituted, which might imply fulfillment. However, this verse implies that it was insufficient, which could confuse those who view the Old Testament priesthood as perfect or complete within its own context.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in Hebrews 7:11 could arise from the idea that the old system of law and priesthood was insufficient, suggesting a need for change or improvement. This could seem inconsistent with the belief that God's laws and systems are perfect.