Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states He has not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it, implying the law remains significant.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
Paul asserts that faith does not void the law but establishes it, suggesting continuity.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 1:25
This verse declares that the word of the Lord endures forever, indicating permanence rather than obsolescence.
1 Peter 1:25: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.
Contradiction with Psalm 119:160
This verse claims the entirety of God's law is eternal, conflicting with the idea of becoming obsolete.
Psalm 119:160: Thy word [is] true [from] the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments [endureth] for ever. [Thy word...: Heb. The beginning of thy word is true]
Contradiction with Matthew 24:35
Jesus proclaims that His words will never pass away, suggesting timeless validity.
Matthew 24:35: Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
Paradox #1
Hebrews 8:13 suggests that the old covenant is becoming obsolete and will soon disappear. For some, this could conflict with the idea that the laws given in the Old Testament are eternal and unchanging. This contradiction may arise between those who believe the old laws still apply and those who believe the new covenant, through Jesus, replaces them.
Paradox #2
Hebrews 8:13 suggests that the old covenant is becoming obsolete and will soon disappear, which might seem to contradict the belief held by some that the laws and commandments from the Old Testament still apply. This could create a tension between adhering to traditional Jewish laws and the new covenant introduced by Jesus in the New Testament.
Paradox #3
Hebrews 8:13 discusses the concept of an "old" covenant becoming obsolete due to the introduction of a "new" covenant. A potential contradiction could be the interpretation and application of Jewish laws and traditions. Some might see this as conflicting with the idea that God's laws are eternal and unchanging, as it suggests a shift from the old Jewish covenant to a new Christian one. This could be seen as inconsistent with the belief that earlier covenants, like those with Abraham and Moses, were permanent.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict might arise from the idea of a new covenant replacing an old one. Some might see this as inconsistent, questioning the permanence of divine laws or promises. It could lead to confusion about which rules or principles should be followed, or how past teachings fit with new instructions.