Contradiction with Romans 11:29
This verse implies God's gifts and calling are irrevocable, contrasting the idea of replacing the old covenant with a new one.
Romans 11:29: For the gifts and calling of God [are] without repentance.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:18
Here, Jesus emphasizes the endurance of the law, hinting at continuity rather than change noted in Hebrews 8:8.
Matthew 5:18: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Contradiction with Malachi 3:6
This verse stresses God’s unchanging nature, contrasting the introduction of a new covenant suggested in Hebrews 8:8.
Malachi 3:6: For I [am] the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.
Contradiction with Psalm 111:7-8
It states that God’s commandments are steadfast and unchanging, differing from the concept of a new covenant.
Psalm 111:7-8: The works of his hands [are] verity and judgment; all his commandments [are] sure.
Contradiction with Isaiah 40:8
This verse asserts the permanence of God's word, suggesting no need for a new covenant as mentioned in Hebrews 8:8.
Isaiah 40:8: The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.
Paradox #1
Hebrews 8:8 refers to the idea of a "new covenant" which suggests that the old covenant was not perfect. Some people might see this as a contradiction because it raises questions about why an originally perfect God would make a covenant that needed replacing. However, many theologians explain this by saying it was part of a divine plan that unfolds over time.