Contradiction with Matthew 5:18
Contradicts by emphasizing the permanence of the law.
Matthew 5:18: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
Suggests that faith does not nullify the law but upholds it.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Contradiction with James 2:10
Indicates that failing in one point of the law means being guilty of all, implying ongoing importance.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
States that Jesus did not come to abolish the law, contradicting the temporary nature suggested in Hebrews 9:10.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:10
Those who rely on the law are under a curse, suggesting a necessity beyond the ceremonial aspects noted in Hebrews 9:10.
Galatians 3:10: For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Paradox #1
Hebrews 9:10 might seem inconsistent when considering the transition from Jewish traditional practices to the new covenant in Christianity. The verse refers to rituals and regulations that were part of Jewish customs, which some early Christians believed were no longer necessary with the coming of Jesus. This shift could cause confusion or conflict between maintaining old traditions and embracing the new teachings, as followers were adapting to changes in religious practices and beliefs.