Contradiction with Exodus 30:10
This verse describes an annual atonement ritual with blood, conflicting with Hebrews 9:12's view on Christ's single, eternal redemption.
Exodus 30:10: And Aaron shall make an atonement upon the horns of it once in a year with the blood of the sin offering of atonements: once in the year shall he make atonement upon it throughout your generations: it [is] most holy unto the LORD.
Contradiction with Leviticus 16:34
It mandates yearly atonement sacrifices, which contrasts with the once-for-all sacrifice described in Hebrews 9:12.
Leviticus 16:34: And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you, to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year. And he did as the LORD commanded Moses.
Contradiction with Numbers 28:3
This specifies daily offerings, contrasting Hebrews 9:12's claim of a single redemptive act.
Numbers 28:3: And thou shalt say unto them, This [is] the offering made by fire which ye shall offer unto the LORD; two lambs of the first year without spot day by day, [for] a continual burnt offering. [day by day: Heb. in a day]
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1-4
These verses emphasize the repetition of sacrifices under the law, contradicting the idea of a once-for-all sacrifice in Hebrews 9:12.
Hebrews 10:1-4: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:11
It discusses the continual nature of priestly sacrifices, opposing the single event of redemption in Hebrews 9:12.
Hebrews 10:11: And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:
Paradox #1
Hebrews 9:12 speaks about the eternal redemption achieved through Jesus' sacrifice. A possible contradiction or conflict might arise when comparing this verse with Old Testament teachings on animal sacrifices for atonement, which were temporary and required repetition. Some might see a conflict between the old system and the new concept of a single, once-for-all sacrifice through Jesus. This could be seen as inconsistent with the earlier practices described in the Bible.
Paradox #2
Some people find a contradiction in Hebrews 9:12 regarding the idea of Jesus entering a heavenly sanctuary as a high priest. Critics argue that the Jewish understanding traditionally involved a physical temple, and there is no direct Old Testament basis for a high priest entering a heavenly sanctuary. This can be seen as conflicting with traditional Jewish beliefs.
Paradox #3
The concept in this verse—about obtaining eternal redemption through a sacrificial act—may conflict with a scientific understanding of the universe, as science does not support the idea of spiritual redemption or the efficacy of sacrifices for salvation. Science relies on empirical evidence and does not address spiritual or supernatural claims.
Paradox #4
Some people might see a contradiction in the idea of someone else's suffering or sacrifice being necessary to achieve forgiveness or redemption for others. It could be seen as conflicting with the belief that individuals are directly responsible for their own actions and should earn forgiveness through personal growth or change rather than relying on another's actions.