Contradiction with Romans 9:27
Romans 9:27 speaks of a remnant of Israel being saved, in contrast to Hosea 1:10, which refers to an innumerable offspring.
Romans 9:27: Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:
Contradiction with Matthew 7:13-14
While Hosea 1:10 talks about a vast number of people, Matthew 7:13-14 implies a narrow gate with few finding the path to life.
Matthew 7:13-14: Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide [is] the gate, and broad [is] the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: [strait: or, narrow]
Contradiction with Isaiah 10:22
Similar to Romans 9:27, Isaiah 10:22 mentions that although the people of Israel are numerous, only a remnant will return, contrasting the idea of an uncountable population in Hosea 1:10.
Isaiah 10:22: For though thy people Israel be as the sand of the sea, [yet] a remnant of them shall return: the consumption decreed shall overflow with righteousness. [of them: Heb. in, or, among, etc] [with: or, in]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 30:11
Jeremiah 30:11 talks about making a full end of nations yet correcting but not fully destroying Israel, which can be seen as conflicting with the expansive promise in Hosea 1:10.
Jeremiah 30:11: For I [am] with thee, saith the LORD, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished.
Paradox #1
Hosea 1:10 might seem inconsistent with earlier biblical promises about the special status of Israel. While previous texts suggest a unique relationship between God and the Israelites, this verse implies a broader inclusion of people as God's children, potentially conflicting with the idea of exclusivity.
Paradox #2
Hosea 1:10 suggests that despite previous judgments, the people of Israel will be numerous and recognized as God's children. This could seem to contradict with other parts of the Bible where the Israelites face severe consequences for their actions. The inconsistency lies in balancing themes of punishment and promised restoration.
Paradox #3
The contradiction could be that Hosea 1:10 talks about the people of Israel being numerous and having a special relationship with God, but historically, there were times when the Israelites faced decline, exile, and hardships that seemed inconsistent with this promise.
Paradox #4
Hosea 1:10 speaks about a promise of numerous descendants and a positive future for the people of Israel despite their previous unfaithfulness. A contradiction might arise when considering the broader context of the Book of Hosea, which includes themes of punishment and judgment for infidelity and wrongdoing. This could seem inconsistent with the message of hope and restoration, as the severe consequences and the promise of redemption might appear to conflict with each other.