Contradiction with Exodus 15:3
The verse describes God as a man of war, while Hosea 1:7 emphasizes salvation not by war or battle.
Exodus 15:3: The LORD [is] a man of war: the LORD [is] his name.
Contradiction with 2 Kings 19:35
This verse depicts salvation through an angel destroying an army, which contrasts with Hosea 1:7 stating salvation will not be through bow or battle.
2 Kings 19:35: And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the LORD went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they [were] all dead corpses.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 21:5
Here, God is said to fight against His people with a strong hand, contradicting His promise of non-military salvation in Hosea 1:7.
Jeremiah 21:5: And I myself will fight against you with an outstretched hand and with a strong arm, even in anger, and in fury, and in great wrath.
Contradiction with Matthew 10:34
Jesus states He came not to bring peace but a sword, contrasting with the peaceful salvation approach in Hosea 1:7.
Matthew 10:34: Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Contradiction with Revelation 19:11
The verse portrays Jesus as a warrior on a white horse, conflicting with the non-violent salvation mentioned in Hosea 1:7.
Revelation 19:11: And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him [was] called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Hosea 1:7 could be that it speaks of God saving a group of people without using conventional means like weapons or human warriors. This might seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible where God's deliverance often involves the use of armies or human leaders, as seen in many stories in the Old Testament. This verse emphasizes divine intervention in a way that contrasts with human methods, highlighting God's direct role in salvation.
Paradox #2
Hosea 1:7 emphasizes God saving without weapons or battle. Some might see a contradiction when comparing this with other verses where God aids in battles and wars, using human armies. This might seem inconsistent because it portrays different methods of divine intervention. However, these different methods can be seen as part of a broader understanding of God's power and choices in different situations.
Paradox #3
Hosea 1:7 suggests that God will save the house of Judah but not by conventional means like war or weaponry, implying divine intervention instead. A contradiction might arise when comparing this verse to other biblical accounts where Judah is depicted as using military force or alliances for protection and victory. If other parts of the Bible describe military assistance as essential for Judah’s survival or success, it could appear inconsistent with the message of Hosea 1:7. However, interpretations vary, and this may not universally be seen as a conflict.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or inconsistency in Hosea 1:7 could stem from the idea of selective mercy. The verse suggests that God chooses to save one group while not extending the same mercy to others. This could be seen as conflicting with the idea of a universally just and merciful deity, as it raises questions about fairness and the equal treatment of all people.