Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 7:14
Promises forgiveness and healing if people repent and return to God, suggesting a continued relationship with His people.
2 Chronicles 7:14: If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land. [which...: Heb. upon whom my name is called]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:33
God declares He will make a new covenant with His people and continue to be their God.
Jeremiah 31:33: But this [shall be] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Contradiction with Romans 11:1
Affirms that God has not rejected His people, Israel.
Romans 11:1: I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, [of] the tribe of Benjamin.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 37:23
Assures that God will save His people from their sins and they will be His people.
Ezekiel 37:23: Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols, nor with their detestable things, nor with any of their transgressions: but I will save them out of all their dwellingplaces, wherein they have sinned, and will cleanse them: so shall they be my people, and I will be their God.
Paradox #1
The statement in Hosea 1:9 could seem to contradict the general biblical theme of God’s enduring relationship with Israel, as it suggests a separation between God and the people. However, this is often understood in context as a temporary judgment rather than a permanent state. So, what seems like a contradiction is reconciled by the broader narrative of redemption.
Paradox #2
The verse in question reflects God telling Hosea that the Israelites are "not my people." The doctrinal tension arises because, throughout the Bible, the Israelites are often referred to as God's chosen people. This may seem inconsistent with the many promises of God's everlasting covenant with Israel. However, the verse can be understood as a temporary expression of God's disappointment due to Israel's unfaithfulness, rather than a permanent rejection. Later scriptures often reaffirm God's enduring relationship with Israel despite their shortcomings.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in Hosea 1:9 might relate to the changing relationship between God and the Israelites. This specific verse indicates a time when God declared a separation from the Israelites, which seems to conflict with other parts of the Bible showing God's enduring covenant and commitment to Israel. This shift might be seen as inconsistent with the unbroken promises elsewhere in the biblical narrative.
Paradox #4
Hosea 1:9 reflects a moment of God expressing disownment of His people because of their unfaithfulness. A possible contradiction could be the tension between God's unconditional love and the decision to temporarily disown or distance Himself from His people. This creates a conflict between divine love and justice or discipline.