Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
This verse states that God supplies all needs according to His riches, while Hosea 2:5 reflects Israel attributing provision to false gods rather than acknowledging God as the provider.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:33
Jesus emphasizes seeking the kingdom of God first for provision, which contrasts with Hosea 2:5, where Israel seeks sustenance from lovers/idols rather than prioritizing God.
Matthew 6:33: But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Contradiction with James 1:17
Describes every good and perfect gift as coming from above, contradicting Hosea 2:5, where Israel attributes their gifts to false gods instead of acknowledging God as the source.
James 1:17: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 8:17-18
Warns against crediting one's wealth to personal effort or false idols, contradicting the attitude of Hosea 2:5, where Israel claims their provision from other sources than God.
Deuteronomy 8:17-18: And thou say in thine heart, My power and the might of [mine] hand hath gotten me this wealth.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:17
Advises trust in God who richly provides, opposing the claim in Hosea 2:5 that provision comes from pagan deities or lovers rather than God.
1 Timothy 6:17: Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; [uncertain...: Gr. uncertainty of riches]
Paradox #1
The verse in Hosea 2:5 involves a symbolic story where Israel is compared to an unfaithful wife. Some might see a contradiction in how God responds to unfaithfulness. In other parts of the Bible, God is described as patient and forgiving, while here, the language depicts punishment and consequences. The inconsistency could be in balancing love and justice.
Paradox #2
Hosea 2:5 involves a situation where a woman is criticized for her unfaithfulness and her pursuit of other lovers. The contradiction or inconsistency here could be the potential for a double standard, where the woman's actions are condemned, yet similar behaviors by men might not be equally criticized within the cultural and historical context of the time. This raises questions about fairness and equality in moral judgments.