Contradiction with Matthew 24:36
Hosea 6:2 suggests a specific time frame for revival, while Matthew 24:36 indicates that no one knows the day or hour of divine intervention.
Matthew 24:36: But of that day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
Contradiction with Acts 1:7
Hosea 6:2 implies knowledge of a specific timeline, whereas Acts 1:7 states that it is not for humans to know the times or seasons set by God's authority.
Acts 1:7: And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:11
Hosea 6:2 mentions a particular timeline, but Ecclesiastes 3:11 suggests that God's timing and works remain mysterious and beyond human understanding.
Ecclesiastes 3:11: He hath made every [thing] beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:2
Hosea 6:2 offers a timeframe for God's action, yet 1 Thessalonians 5:2 describes the day of the Lord as coming like a thief in the night, unexpectedly.
1 Thessalonians 5:2: For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:8
Hosea 6:2 provides a short period for revival, while 2 Peter 3:8 highlights that with the Lord, a day is like a thousand years, indicating God's timeless perspective.
2 Peter 3:8: But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
Paradox #1
Hosea 6:2 could be seen as conflicting with other parts of the Bible regarding the timeline of events related to resurrection. This verse mentions being raised up after two days, which might not align with the three-day resurrection concept associated with Jesus in the New Testament. So, the inconsistency arises in trying to harmonize different prophetic timelines.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency with Hosea 6:2 lies in its prophetic interpretation. The verse speaks of being revived or restored after two days and raised on the third day. Some interpretations see this as symbolic or metaphorical, while others try to connect it to specific historical events or timelines that are not detailed elsewhere in historical records. This can lead to debates about its intended meaning and accuracy in a historical context.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Hosea 6:2 could arise from differing interpretations of the phrase "two days" and "third day." Some might question whether these numbers should be understood literally or symbolically. This could lead to inconsistencies when comparing to other biblical timelines or prophecies.