Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
This verse speaks of turning swords into plowshares and not learning war, while Isaiah 13:17 implies a preparation for warfare.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Isaiah 11:6-9
These verses describe a peaceful kingdom where harm and destruction will not occur, contrasting with the violent judgment in Isaiah 13:17.
Isaiah 11:6-9: The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Jesus' teaching to love enemies contradicts the motive of stirring up the Medes against Babylon as mentioned in Isaiah 13:17.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse instructs believers not to take vengeance but to leave room for God's wrath, contrasting with the active stirring up of the Medes.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Micah 4:3
Similar to Isaiah 2:4, this verse envisions nations not taking up sword against each other, opposing the warlike image in Isaiah 13:17.
Micah 4:3: And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Paradox #1
Isaiah 13:17 mentions the Medes, a group historically known to have played a part in conquering Babylon. However, some historians debate the timing and role of the Medes in this prophecy compared to the events as they are understood in historical records. There may be inconsistencies in how this aligns with the chronicled history of the Babylonian empire's fall, where the Persians, led by Cyrus the Great, are prominently noted.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Isaiah 13:17 could relate to the idea of promoting violence or destruction, as it describes a scenario where a group is stirred to attack. This can conflict with broader moral teachings about peace and compassion found elsewhere in religious texts.