Contradiction with Psalm 46:4
This verse talks about a river bringing joy to the city of God, contradicting the desolation implied in Isaiah 14:17.
Psalm 46:4: [There is] a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy [place] of the tabernacles of the most High.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 36:35
Describes the land becoming like the Garden of Eden, contrasting the devastation in Isaiah 14:17.
Ezekiel 36:35: And they shall say, This land that was desolate is become like the garden of Eden; and the waste and desolate and ruined cities [are become] fenced, [and] are inhabited.
Contradiction with Isaiah 35:1
Speaks of the desert blooming and rejoicing, opposing the barren imagery of Isaiah 14:17.
Isaiah 35:1: The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose.
Contradiction with Revelation 22:1-2
Describes the river of life and healing, which contrasts with the emptiness of Isaiah 14:17.
Revelation 22:1-2: And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 37:5-6
Talks about God bringing life to dry bones, opposing the state of emptiness in Isaiah 14:17.
Ezekiel 37:5-6: Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live:
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in the verse could arise from the depiction of a powerful ruler who causes widespread destruction and suffering, leading to questions about justice and the responsibility of leadership. Such actions may seem inconsistent with moral principles of compassion and fairness.