Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse states that the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, contradicting the idea in Isaiah 14:21 of punishing children for their fathers' sins.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:16
This verse declares that every man shall be put to death for his own sin, opposing the concept of familial punishment in Isaiah 14:21.
Deuteronomy 24:16: The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:29-30
These verses emphasize individual responsibility for sin, stating that everyone shall die for his own iniquity, contrasting with the collective punishment in Isaiah 14:21.
Jeremiah 31:29-30: In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.
Contradiction with 2 Kings 14:6
It is commanded not to put children to death for their fathers' sins, which stands against the principle expressed in Isaiah 14:21.
2 Kings 14:6: But the children of the murderers he slew not: according unto that which is written in the book of the law of Moses, wherein the LORD commanded, saying, The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, nor the children be put to death for the fathers; but every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 14:21 suggests punishing children for the sins of their ancestors, which can seem to conflict with other parts of the Bible that emphasize individual responsibility for sin, like in Ezekiel 18:20, which states that a person will only be punished for their own sins. This difference in teachings might raise questions about justice and personal accountability.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict might arise from the verse suggesting that descendants are punished for the sins of their ancestors. This could conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize individual responsibility for one's own sins, such as in Ezekiel 18:20, which states that children will not be punished for their parents' sins.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency around Isaiah 14:21 could relate to differing views on collective punishment. In some contexts, this concept conflicts with values of individual moral responsibility commonly found in later religious and philosophical teachings, raising questions about justice when descendants are punished for the actions of their ancestors.
Paradox #4
The conflict with science might be centered around the idea of punishing descendants for the actions of their ancestors, which contradicts modern understandings of individual responsibility and justice. In contemporary ethical and legal systems, people are generally seen as accountable for their own actions, not the actions of their relatives.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict could be seen in the idea of punishing children for the sins of their parents. This raises questions about fairness and justice, as it challenges the belief that individuals should only be responsible for their own actions, not those of their ancestors.