Contradiction with Jeremiah 49:23-27
This passage predicts the destruction of Damascus but includes details that differ from the complete destruction described in Isaiah 17:1.
Jeremiah 49:23-27: Concerning Damascus. Hamath is confounded, and Arpad: for they have heard evil tidings: they are fainthearted; [there is] sorrow on the sea; it cannot be quiet. [fainthearted: Heb. melted] [on...: or, as on the sea]
Contradiction with Amos 1:3-5
Amos speaks about judgment on Damascus, yet the language does not suggest the complete ruin described by Isaiah 17:1.
Amos 1:3-5: Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: [and...: or, yea, for four] [turn...: or, convert it, or, let it be quiet]
Contradiction with Acts 9:1-2
Describes Damascus as a functioning city where Saul intends to capture Christians, suggesting it was not a destroyed or desolate city.
Acts 9:1-2: And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,
Contradiction with Jeremiah 46:27-28
Although not directly about Damascus, it promises restoration to the places God has judged, implying eventual recovery rather than complete ruin.
Jeremiah 46:27-28: But fear not thou, O my servant Jacob, and be not dismayed, O Israel: for, behold, I will save thee from afar off, and thy seed from the land of their captivity; and Jacob shall return, and be in rest and at ease, and none shall make [him] afraid.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 11:32-33
Mentions an active city of Damascus with a king's governor, indicating it was not left in ruins as per Isaiah 17:1.
2 Corinthians 11:32-33: In Damascus the governor under Aretas the king kept the city of the Damascenes with a garrison, desirous to apprehend me:
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding Isaiah 17:1 is that it predicts the complete destruction of Damascus. However, Damascus is one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world, and it has never been fully destroyed as described in the prophecy. This discrepancy between the prophecy and historical reality is seen as a point of conflict for some interpretations.
Paradox #2
The contradiction, inconsistency, or conflict could be in the differing interpretations of justice and compassion. Some might view the verse as a necessary act of justice, while others could see it as lacking mercy or compassion. Different perspectives might conflict over the balance between justice and forgiveness.