Contradiction with Isaiah 57:13
Isaiah 57:13 suggests that relying on one's idols is futile, which contradicts Isaiah 17:10, where forgetting God aligns with tending strange plants, implying a misplaced reliance or forgetfulness.
Isaiah 57:13: When thou criest, let thy companies deliver thee; but the wind shall carry them all away; vanity shall take [them]: but he that putteth his trust in me shall possess the land, and shall inherit my holy mountain;
Paradox #1
Isaiah 17:10 talks about forgetting God, who provides protection and care, and instead focusing on planting pleasant plants and foreign vines. The contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing this with passages that emphasize God's enduring love and grace despite human forgetfulness. Some might wonder how God's unending love fits with the consequences described here when people turn away from Him.However, generally, this verse emphasizes the importance of remembering and relying on God rather than trusting in other, less reliable sources. It underscores a common biblical theme of faithfulness to God. Overall, there is no major contradiction here, but more of a contrast between human actions and divine expectations.
Paradox #2
Isaiah 17:10 may present a contradiction or inconsistency because it discusses the consequences of forgetting and ignoring God despite receiving blessings. The conflict might arise from the perspective that a loving and forgiving God would not punish people for forgetting, especially if they are otherwise good or unaware. This could seem inconsistent with the concept of unconditional love and forgiveness.