Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
While Isaiah 19:1 speaks of coming judgment on Egypt, Jeremiah 29:11 emphasizes hope and prosperity for the future, contrasting the notion of impending doom with a promise of positive plans.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with John 3:16
Isaiah 19:1 focuses on judgment upon a nation, whereas John 3:16 is about God’s love for the world and the promise of eternal life through belief in His Son, highlighting salvation rather than punishment.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with James 1:17
Isaiah 19:1 mentions the Lord coming with a burden, implying an afflictive presence, whereas James 1:17 speaks of God as the giver of every good and perfect gift, highlighting benevolence instead of affliction.
James 1:17: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Isaiah 19:1 portrays God approaching with judgment, while 1 John 4:8 states that God is love, portraying a nature of love rather than impending judgment.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with Psalm 145:9
Isaiah 19:1 describes God coming with a message of woe, while Psalm 145:9 asserts the Lord’s goodness to all, emphasizing mercy over judgment.
Psalm 145:9: The LORD [is] good to all: and his tender mercies [are] over all his works.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 19:1 speaks of judgment against Egypt by the Lord, which historically could be seen as inconsistent with the times Egypt was a significant power and ally to Israel, such as during the reigns of Solomon or under the influence of the Ptolemaic dynasty. This creates a contrast between the depicted downfall and Egypt's periods of strength or alliance with Israel.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in that verse could arise from the depiction of divine judgment and destruction. Some might find it conflicting that a loving and compassionate deity would execute severe judgments on people, potentially leading to suffering and devastation. This seems inconsistent with the idea of a merciful and forgiving God.