Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
While Isaiah 1:20 speaks of vengeance and wrath, Matthew 5:44 encourages love and forgiveness towards enemies, promoting non-violence.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Isaiah 1:20 talks about being devoured by the sword for disobedience, whereas Luke 6:27 emphasizes loving enemies and doing good to those who hate you.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with John 3:17
Isaiah 1:20 talks about destruction for rebellion, whereas John 3:17 states that God did not send His Son to condemn the world but to save it.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Isaiah 1:20 talks about the harsh consequences of rebellion, while James 2:13 highlights that mercy triumphs over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Isaiah 1:20 speaks of devouring enemies with the sword, yet Romans 12:19 teaches to refrain from vengeance since vengeance belongs to the Lord.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Psalm 103:8
Whereas Isaiah 1:20 speaks of a swift response to rebellion with violence, Psalm 103:8 describes God as merciful, gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy.
Psalm 103:8: The LORD [is] merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy. [plentious...: Heb. great in mercy]
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Isaiah 1:20 outlines God’s judgment and wrath, while 1 John 4:8 emphasizes that God is love, focusing on a nature contrary to wrath.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 1:20 may appear to have a theological conflict with the concept of God's unconditional love and forgiveness. The verse discusses consequences for disobedience, which can seem at odds with the idea that God's love and grace are always available to everyone, regardless of their actions. However, this can be understood as a call to accountability and justice, emphasizing the importance of human choice in accepting God's guidance.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be seen in the sternness or severity of the consequence described for disobedience. Some might argue that it conflicts with the idea of a loving and forgiving nature of God, as depicted in other parts of the Bible. This can create tension between justice and mercy in the text.