Contradiction with Isaiah 60:19
Isaiah 60:19 claims the sun and moon will no longer be needed, contradicting the emphasis on celestial glory in Isaiah 24:23.
Isaiah 60:19: The sun shall be no more thy light by day; neither for brightness shall the moon give light unto thee: but the LORD shall be unto thee an everlasting light, and thy God thy glory.
Contradiction with Revelation 21:23
Revelations 21:23 states that the city has no need of the sun or moon, differing from the imagery of celestial lights in Isaiah 24:23.
Revelation 21:23: And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb [is] the light thereof.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 33:20
Jeremiah 33:20 presents a promise of continuity for the ordinances of day and night, contrasting the imagery of divine overshadowing in Isaiah 24:23.
Jeremiah 33:20: Thus saith the LORD; If ye can break my covenant of the day, and my covenant of the night, and that there should not be day and night in their season;
Contradiction with Psalm 104:19
Psalm 104:19 highlights the role of the moon for seasons, which contradicts the overshadowing glory of the Lord upon the moon mentioned in Isaiah 24:23.
Psalm 104:19: He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his going down.
Contradiction with Matthew 24:29
Matthew 24:29 notes a future where the sun is darkened and the moon doesn't give light, differing from the bright glory over celestial bodies in Isaiah 24:23.
Matthew 24:29: Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: