Contradiction with Psalm 118:22
This verse refers to the stone as rejected, while Isaiah 28:16 describes it as precious and cornerstone.
Psalm 118:22: The stone [which] the builders refused is become the head [stone] of the corner.
Contradiction with Isaiah 8:14
This verse indicates that the stone can be a stumbling block, contrasting with Isaiah 28:16 where it is foundation.
Isaiah 8:14: And he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
Contradiction with Matthew 21:42
Quotes Psalm 118:22 about rejecting the cornerstone, opposed to Isaiah 28:16 which affirms it firmly.
Matthew 21:42: Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 1:23
Shows Christ as a stumbling for Jews, conflicting with cornerstone signifying strength in Isaiah 28:16.
1 Corinthians 1:23: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;
Contradiction with Romans 9:32-33
Talks about stumbling over the stone, while Isaiah 28:16 sees it as secure foundation.
Romans 9:32-33: Wherefore? Because [they sought it] not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
Contradiction with 1 Peter 2:8
Refers to a stone of stumbling, contrary to the solid stone Isaiah 28:16 mentions as a foundation.
1 Peter 2:8: And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, [even to them] which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency related to Isaiah 28:16 might arise from differing interpretations about the "cornerstone" mentioned. Some see it as referring to Jesus as the foundation of faith in Christianity, while others interpret it in a different historical or religious context. These varying views can lead to disagreements about its meaning or application within different theological frameworks.