Contradiction with Matthew 5:5
Isaiah 2:2 speaks of the exaltation of the Lord's house above all hills and nations flowing to it, implying a centralization of worship, while Matthew 5:5 emphasizes the meek inheriting the earth, which could be seen as opposing centralized power or focus.
Matthew 5:5: Blessed [are] the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Contradiction with John 4:21
Isaiah 2:2 predicts a future where people from all nations worship at a specific location, while John 4:21 records Jesus telling the Samaritan woman that a time is coming when worship will not be tied to any specific mountain or location.
John 4:21: Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.
Contradiction with Revelation 21:22
Isaiah 2:2 envisions the establishment of the Lord’s house as the focal point for all nations, yet Revelation 21:22 describes a future where there is no temple in the New Jerusalem because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple, suggesting no need for a physical centralized worship location.
Revelation 21:22: And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
Isaiah 2:2 suggests a future significance of Jerusalem and its temple, whereas Hebrews 8:13 implies the old covenant, associated with temple worship, is obsolete and growing old, contrasting the central role ascribed to the temple in Isaiah's prophecy.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.