Contradiction with James 4:12
This verse emphasizes that there is only one lawgiver and judge, which aligns with Isaiah 33:22, but James points to the Lord's singular authority, implying that humankind does not share in judgment, offering a different context in authority sharing.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse encourages people not to judge others, which contrasts with the judicial aspect attributed to the Lord in Isaiah 33:22, suggesting a human practice not supported in Isaiah.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
This verse highlights that humans also judge, potentially contradicting the exclusive divine judicial authority described in Isaiah 33:22.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Contradiction with John 5:22
This verse states that all judgment is given by the Father to the Son, implying a different judicial role than offered in Isaiah 33:22, where the Lord encompasses all roles.
John 5:22: For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:30
This verse affirms that vengeance belongs to the Lord, which could contrast the idea of a legislative and judicial role as humans are involved in law's execution, not just divine retribution.
Hebrews 10:30: For we know him that hath said, Vengeance [belongeth] unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.