Contradiction with Psalm 104:5
This verse says the earth is established forever, contradicting the idea of continuous burning and desolation.
Psalm 104:5: [Who] laid the foundations of the earth, [that] it should not be removed for ever. [Who...: Heb. He hath founded the earth upon her bases]
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 1:4
States the earth abides forever, opposing the notion of perpetual desolation of lands.
Ecclesiastes 1:4: [One] generation passeth away, and [another] generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
Contradiction with Genesis 8:22
Promises a continuation of seasons, contrasting the perpetual destruction described in Isaiah 34:10.
Genesis 8:22: While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease. [While...: Heb. As yet all the days of the earth]
Contradiction with Revelation 21:1
Describes a new earth, conflicting with the idea of eternal desolation on the current earth.
Revelation 21:1: And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction in Isaiah 34:10 could relate to the idea of a place being eternally desolate, which might conflict with other biblical themes of redemption and restoration. Some passages in the Bible speak of eventual renewal and restoration of the earth, so the concept of never-ending destruction could seem inconsistent with those themes.
Paradox #2
The contradiction with Isaiah 34:10 lies in the depiction of perpetual destruction or unending desolation. Critics often point out that locations referred to as being eternally devastated in such prophetic texts have seen various degrees of habitation and renewal over centuries, suggesting a potential inconsistency between the prophecy and historical or archaeological evidence.
Paradox #3
The verse describes a place where smoke rises forever and it's never inhabited again. A contradiction might be that in reality, natural fires eventually burn out and areas can be repopulated over time. Permanent, unending fire or smoke isn't consistent with our understanding of ecology and the physical world.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Isaiah 34:10 could be seen in the context of it describing eternal destruction and desolation as a punishment from God, which might conflict with the idea of a compassionate and forgiving deity. Some might find it inconsistent with the messages of mercy and redemption found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #5
Isaiah 34:10 states that the land will burn forever, which might be seen as a contradiction because fire typically consumes its fuel and extinguishes after a period of time. Such perpetual burning without being consumed could seem scientifically inconsistent.