Contradiction with Jeremiah 50:39-40
Unlike Isaiah 43:14, which suggests the deliverance of Israel and the downfall of Babylon, Jeremiah 50:39-40 indicates a complete destruction of Babylon, never to be inhabited again, suggesting no redemption or restoration.
Jeremiah 50:39-40: Therefore the wild beasts of the desert with the wild beasts of the islands shall dwell [there], and the owls shall dwell therein: and it shall be no more inhabited for ever; neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation.
Contradiction with Revelation 18:2
Isaiah 43:14 suggests that Babylon's fall will lead to Israel's redemption, while Revelation 18:2 describes Babylon's fall as a permanent demise, indicating that it will become a dwelling place for demons, and not linked specifically to Israel's deliverance.
Revelation 18:2: And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 25:12-13
In contrast to Isaiah 43:14's redemption theme through the fall of Babylon, this passage implies a prolonged period of desolation and punishment for Babylon, extending beyond a single event of deliverance for Israel.
Jeremiah 25:12-13: And it shall come to pass, when seventy years are accomplished, [that] I will punish the king of Babylon, and that nation, saith the LORD, for their iniquity, and the land of the Chaldeans, and will make it perpetual desolations. [punish: Heb. visit upon]
Contradiction with Isaiah 13:19-22
Although Isaiah 43:14 discusses Babylon's fall to facilitate Israel's redemption, Isaiah 13:19-22 emphasizes an irreversible destruction of Babylon, with no indication of Israel's specific deliverance related to this event.
Isaiah 13:19-22: And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. [as...: Heb. as the overthrowing]