Contradiction with John 3:18
This verse suggests that belief in Jesus is necessary for salvation, contrasting with Isaiah 45:17, which implies that Israel is saved unconditionally.
John 3:18: He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Contradiction with Romans 11:26
It states that "all Israel shall be saved," aligning with Isaiah 45:17, but further context in Romans discusses conditional aspects of faith.
Romans 11:26: And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Contradiction with Matthew 7:14
It mentions the narrow path to salvation, suggesting that not all are saved, contradicting the assured salvation of Israel in Isaiah 45:17.
Matthew 7:14: Because strait [is] the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. [Because: or, How]
Contradiction with Revelation 21:8
Describes those who will face the second death, showing that not everyone is unconditionally saved, unlike the assurance in Isaiah 45:17.
Revelation 21:8: But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Contradiction with Matthew 25:46
Discusses eternal punishment for some, contradicting the absolute salvation mentioned in Isaiah 45:17.
Matthew 25:46: And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 45:17 talks about Israel's everlasting salvation. Some may see a contradiction when comparing this with New Testament teachings that suggest salvation is available to all people, not just Israel. This might seem inconsistent because the Old Testament focuses on Israel's special role, while the New Testament expands salvation to include all believers through Jesus.
Paradox #2
Isaiah 45:17 mentions Israel being saved with an everlasting salvation, but historically, Israel faced numerous invasions, exiles, and hardships. This contradiction arises because the promise of eternal security and prosperity doesn't align with the historical challenges and suffering experienced by the nation over time.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Isaiah 45:17 could be the idea of exclusivity versus inclusivity. This verse suggests a special favor or salvation for a specific group, which might seem to conflict with the broader notion of universal love and acceptance. It raises questions about fairness and the moral implications of favoring one group over others.