Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5
This verse advises to trust in the Lord and not rely on one's own understanding, which contrasts with Isaiah 50:11, where relying on one's own efforts and creations leads to downfall.
Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:25
This verse states there is a way that seems right to a person but ends in death, contradicting Isaiah 50:11 where human ways result in peril.
Proverbs 16:25: There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof [are] the ways of death.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:5
This verse warns against trusting in humans and flesh, opposing Isaiah 50:11's implication that relying on one's own light leads to trouble.
Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the LORD; Cursed [be] the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:13
This verse speaks of the wide path leading to destruction, contrasting with Isaiah 50:11 where following one's own guidance leads to torment.
Matthew 7:13: Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide [is] the gate, and broad [is] the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: [strait: or, narrow]
Contradiction with Galatians 6:8
This verse emphasizes sowing to the Spirit for eternal life, in direct contradiction to Isaiah 50:11's depiction of self-reliance leading to sorrow.
Galatians 6:8: For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction in Isaiah 50:11 might be the contrast between relying on one's own efforts and God's guidance. In some biblical passages, self-reliance is depicted as wise or industrious, while in others, like this verse, it suggests going against God's will and leading to negative consequences. This could create tension in understanding how much one should depend on personal abilities versus divine intervention.
Paradox #2
Isaiah 50:11 might be seen as conflicting because it warns against relying on one's own guidance instead of trusting in God, which could seem at odds with other biblical teachings that emphasize human responsibility and initiative. This tension between divine guidance and human action could be seen as a doctrinal inconsistency, where some might interpret relying solely on oneself as leading to negative outcomes, yet elsewhere the Bible encourages using wisdom and making wise decisions.
Paradox #3
Isaiah 50:11 is interpreted by some as a warning against relying on one's own efforts instead of God's guidance. A potential contradiction might be seen in differing interpretations within religious traditions about self-reliance versus divine reliance. Some might argue that self-reliance is not always negative, creating an inconsistency when viewed alongside other biblical teachings that encourage wise planning and personal responsibility. This can lead to different understandings of the balance between faith and personal action.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in Isaiah 50:11 could relate to the idea of relying on one's own efforts and wisdom instead of trusting divine guidance. It might seem inconsistent because other parts of scripture encourage taking initiative and using one's abilities. This verse could be interpreted as a warning against self-sufficiency that ignores or defies faith, which may appear to conflict with the value of human agency and responsibility shown elsewhere in the Bible.