Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Isaiah 50:6 speaks of willingly offering one's back to those who strike, whereas Matthew 5:39 teaches turning the other cheek in response to aggression, suggesting a passive form of resistance rather than submission.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:26
Isaiah 50:6 depicts a figure subjecting themselves to mistreatment, while Proverbs 25:26 criticizes the righteous who are subdued before the wicked as a muddied spring.
Proverbs 25:26: A righteous man falling down before the wicked [is as] a troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring.
Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
Isaiah 50:6 shows a readiness to take on suffering, yet Exodus 21:24 highlights the principle of "an eye for an eye," suggesting retributive justice instead of accepting harm.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
Isaiah 50:6 describes enduring physical abuse without resistance, while Luke 6:29 suggests offering the other cheek, implying a choice to rise above the affront, contrasting the passive acceptance in Isaiah.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Contradiction with James 4:7
Isaiah 50:6 involves being submissive to others' aggression, while James 4:7 urges believers to resist the devil and implies taking a stand against adversaries.
James 4:7: Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
Isaiah 50:6 involves conceding to suffering at the hands of others, but Proverbs 20:22 advises against repaying evil with evil, promoting waiting on the Lord for justice, suggesting patience rather than direct submission.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Isaiah 50:6 could be seen as the conflict between enduring suffering and the instinct to resist harm. The verse suggests accepting mistreatment without retaliation, which can clash with the idea of self-defense or standing against injustice. This can create tension between suffering willingly and the moral duty to protect oneself and others from harm.