Contradictions and Paradoxes in Isaiah 53:7

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Isaiah 53:7 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Isaiah 53:7. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the prophet Isaiah, this means that Jesus, who Christians believe was God's Son, suffered and was treated unfairly, but chose not to complain or defend himself, like a quiet lamb. Christians see this as a sign of his great love and patience.

Isaiah 53:7: He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

Contradiction with Matthew 27:12

In contrast to "he opened not his mouth" in Isaiah 53:7, Jesus answers the high priest in Matthew 27:12.

Matthew 27:12: And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.

Contradiction with John 18:22-23

Instead of remaining silent as in Isaiah 53:7, Jesus responds to the officer who struck him.

John 18:22-23: And when he had thus spoken, one of the officers which stood by struck Jesus with the palm of his hand, saying, Answerest thou the high priest so? [with...: or, with a rod]

Contradiction with Matthew 26:63-64

This passage shows Jesus speaking to the high priest, contrary to the silence described in Isaiah 53:7.

Matthew 26:63-64: Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

Contradiction with John 19:10-11

Jesus answers Pilate, which contradicts the depiction of silence in Isaiah 53:7.

John 19:10-11: Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee?

Paradox #1

The potential contradiction or conflict with Isaiah 53:7 can relate to the interpretation of the figure described in the text. Some see it as a prophecy about Jesus as the "suffering servant," aligning with New Testament accounts of his life and death. However, others argue it refers to Israel or a different historical figure, leading to differing views among scholars and religious groups about the identity and interpretation of the "servant." This discrepancy can lead to conflicting understandings depending on one's religious or historical perspective.

Paradox #2

The potential contradiction in this verse could be the idea of remaining silent and passive in the face of suffering or injustice. Some might see this as conflicting with the belief that one should speak out or take action against wrongdoing rather than endure it quietly. This can be seen as inconsistent with the moral imperative to fight for justice and resist oppression.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.