Contradiction with Isaiah 14:1-2
These verses speak about Israel taking captives rather than foreigners serving them willingly, which can be seen as a forced rather than voluntary service.
Isaiah 14:1-2: For the LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob.
Contradiction with Leviticus 25:44-46
This passage permits Israelites to own foreigners as property, a notion contrasted by the potentially willing and dignified service mentioned in Isaiah 61:5.
Leviticus 25:44-46: Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, [shall be] of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
Contradiction with Exodus 22:21
This verse commands kindness to foreigners, contradicting the concept of foreigners serving Israelites in subservient roles.
Exodus 22:21: Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 10:19
Here, the Israelites are instructed to love foreigners, contrasting with the concept of having them in servitude.
Deuteronomy 10:19: Love ye therefore the stranger: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This New Testament verse speaks of equality in Christ, contrasting with the hierarchical relationship implied in Isaiah 61:5.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 61:5 might raise questions about roles and relationships between different groups of people, which some could see as conflicting with messages of equality and unity found elsewhere in the Bible, such as in the New Testament. It could be seen as suggesting a division of labor or social hierarchy, which might appear inconsistent with the idea that all are equal before God.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency related to Isaiah 61:5 could arise from differing interpretations about who the "foreigners" or "strangers" are and their roles. At various points in history, different groups may have understood this verse to support opposing views on social hierarchy, race relations, or foreign policy. This can lead to conflicts about inclusion, equality, or the treatment of outsiders.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in Isaiah 61:5 could be seen in the perceived endorsement of social hierarchies or inequality. The verse could be interpreted as suggesting a division between groups, with some people being in positions of service to others, which might raise questions about equality and justice.