Contradiction with Deuteronomy 30:19
This verse emphasizes human choice and responsibility to choose life and blessings, which contrasts with the idea of God causing people to err from His ways as seen in Isaiah 63:17.
Deuteronomy 30:19: I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, [that] I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
Contradiction with Joshua 24:15
This verse suggests that people have the freedom to choose whom they will serve, which contradicts the notion in Isaiah 63:17 of God hardening hearts, implying a lack of personal agency.
Joshua 24:15: And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that [were] on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:31
This verse calls for individuals to make a new heart and spirit for themselves, indicating that responsibility lies with people, not God causing them to stray, as suggested in Isaiah 63:17.
Ezekiel 18:31: Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Contradiction with James 1:13-14
This passage states that God does not tempt anyone and that individuals are drawn away by their own desires, contradicting the idea in Isaiah 63:17 that God might lead people into error.
James 1:13-14: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse expresses that God is not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance, opposing the idea of God causing people to depart from His ways as suggested in Isaiah 63:17.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 63:17 raises a question about why God would allow people to go astray from His ways and harden their hearts. This can feel like a contradiction because, on one hand, God desires people to follow Him and make righteous choices, but on the other hand, this verse seems to suggest that God might actively let people stray or make it difficult for them to follow Him. This can lead to confusion about human free will and God's role in guiding or allowing people to make their own choices.
Paradox #2
The verse could raise questions about why God would allow or cause people to stray, potentially conflicting with the idea of human free will or God's desire for people to choose righteousness of their own accord.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Isaiah 63:17 could be related to the question of divine control versus human free will. The verse suggests that God may cause people to go astray, which raises questions about why a just and loving God would lead people away from Him, potentially conflicting with the idea that humans are responsible for their own choices. This contradiction can lead to debates about the nature of God and the balance between divine intervention and personal responsibility.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in this verse is the idea of God influencing people's actions and then holding them responsible for those actions. It raises questions about free will and accountability if God is involved in hardening their hearts, making it more challenging to differentiate between divine influence and personal choice.