Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
While Isaiah 63:6 speaks of treading down nations in anger, this verse directs to love your enemies and bless them that curse you.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Contrasts with Isaiah 63:6's theme of vengeance; advises believers to leave vengeance to God and not take it themselves.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
Suggests that God is patient and not willing that any should perish, contrasting with the wrath and destruction depicted in Isaiah 63:6.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:32
Promotes kindness and forgiveness, opposing the image of wrathful judgment in Isaiah 63:6.
Ephesians 4:32: And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
Advocates a soft answer to turn away wrath, different from the actions described in Isaiah 63:6.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 63:6 might seem contradictory for some because it depicts a God who punishes and destroys in anger, while other parts of the Bible emphasize God's love, mercy, and forgiveness. Balancing God's justice with His mercy can be challenging for some readers.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency might arise from interpreting Isaiah 63:6 in the context of a loving, peaceful message often associated with other parts of the Bible. This verse describes judgment and vengeance, which can seem inconsistent with passages that emphasize forgiveness and compassion. This difference can lead to conflicting views on God's nature in the Bible.
Paradox #3
The verse describes a divine action with great violence and wrath. Scientifically, this conflicts with the understanding of human behavior being influenced by physical laws and the observable natural world. The idea of divine wrath as a physical action is not supported by scientific evidence or methods, which focus on phenomena that can be observed, tested, and measured. Therefore, such divine interventions or interactions described in spiritual texts often lack empirical scientific support.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict could relate to the themes of divine judgment and wrath. While many parts of religious texts emphasize love, mercy, and forgiveness, this verse highlights vengeance and destruction. This can seem inconsistent to some with the overall message of compassion and redemption seen elsewhere in religious teachings.