Contradiction with Psalm 37:19
This verse mentions the righteous being satisfied in times of famine, suggesting provision for all the righteous, not just a select group.
Psalm 37:19: They shall not be ashamed in the evil time: and in the days of famine they shall be satisfied.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:6
This verse states that those who hunger for righteousness will be filled, implying a universal promise of satisfaction without distinction.
Matthew 5:6: Blessed [are] they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
This verse speaks of God supplying all needs, not specifying division between the faithful and unfaithful as in Isaiah 65:13.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 8:28
This verse suggests that all things work together for good for those who love God, implying their needs will be met differently from the outlined suffering in Isaiah 65:13.
Romans 8:28: And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.
Contradiction with Luke 6:20-21
This verse gives blessings to those who hunger, implying future satisfaction as opposed to the dismal fate for the unfaithful mentioned in Isaiah 65:13.
Luke 6:20-21: And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said, Blessed [be ye] poor: for yours is the kingdom of God.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in Isaiah 65:13 might be seen in its depiction of reward and punishment based on obedience or disobedience to God. Some may argue that it could contradict the idea of unconditional love or mercy, as it emphasizes consequences over forgiveness. However, interpretations vary widely, and some see it as a matter of justice rather than a contradiction.