Contradiction with Romans 6:23
Explains that the wages of sin is death, whereas Isaiah 65:20 suggests prolonged life even for sinners.
Romans 6:23: For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:27
States that humans die once before judgment, but Isaiah 65:20 implies a different timeline for death.
Hebrews 9:27: And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 9:5
Claims that the dead know nothing, opposing Isaiah 65:20 which implies knowledge in longevity.
Ecclesiastes 9:5: For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
Contradiction with John 11:26
Suggests believers will never die, contrasting with any death mentioned even for the young in Isaiah 65:20.
John 11:26: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:22
States that in Christ all shall be made alive, conflicting with Isaiah 65:20 mentioning death.
1 Corinthians 15:22: For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 65:20 presents a picture of longevity and prosperity in a future world that differs from the idea of eternal life often associated with Christian theology. This could be seen as conflicting with the New Testament view of eternal life, where death and aging are ultimately overcome. The verse suggests that people will live much longer but still die, which might seem inconsistent with the promise of immortality in Christian teachings about the afterlife.
Paradox #2
Isaiah 65:20 may seem to conflict with the belief that there will be no death or pain in the new heaven and new earth, as described in Revelation 21:4. Some interpret Isaiah 65:20 as suggesting that people will still die, but at an old age, which can appear inconsistent with the idea of eternal life without death in the future state.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Isaiah 65:20 relates to life expectancy. The verse implies very long human lifespans, which contradicts scientific understanding of human biology and average life expectancy based on historical and modern data.
Paradox #4
Isaiah 65:20 might present a contradiction or inconsistency in how it describes longevity and mortality. It suggests a time or place where people live longer lives, yet it still implies the presence of death and the potential for a shorter life span under certain circumstances. This could conflict with the idea of an ideal world being one without death or suffering.
Paradox #5
Isaiah 65:20 suggests lifespans and ages that might not align with current human experiences and expectations about longevity. It implies living to a certain old age as a standard, which could seem contradictory when compared to average lifespans we see today. Additionally, the interpretation of certain ages might not be consistent with other biblical references to age and life expectancy.