Contradiction with Revelation 21:4
This verse describes a future where God wipes away every tear and eliminates death, sorrow, and pain, contradictory to the depiction of eternal punishment in Isaiah 66:24.
Revelation 21:4: And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:22
This verse promises life to all in Christ, contrasting with the enduring punishment in Isaiah 66:24.
1 Corinthians 15:22: For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
Contradiction with Matthew 25:46
It speaks of eternal life for the righteous, emphasizing reward rather than the eternal punishment highlighted in Isaiah 66:24.
Matthew 25:46: And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
God takes no pleasure in the death of anyone, in direct contrast to the idea of perpetual punishment implied in Isaiah 66:24.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
Expresses God's desire that none should perish but come to repentance, conflicting with the idea of ongoing annihilation or punishment in Isaiah 66:24.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Paradox #1
Isaiah 66:24 might be seen as conflicting with some views of a loving and merciful God. The verse describes a scene of judgment and punishment that can be interpreted as harsh. This could seem inconsistent with messages of forgiveness and compassion found in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
Isaiah 66:24 could be seen as contradicting the concept of a merciful and forgiving God. It describes a scene of judgment and punishment that may seem harsh and eternal, which can be difficult to reconcile with the idea of infinite mercy and forgiveness emphasized in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
Some people point out a contradiction in tone between Isaiah 66:24 and the messages of peace and forgiveness found elsewhere in the Bible, particularly in the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament. The verse describes a scene of judgment and punishment, which some find inconsistent with the emphasis on mercy and redemption in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #4
The verse from Isaiah describes a scene that could be interpreted as contradicting modern understandings of the natural world, particularly with regard to the concept of eternal physical states. It implies a perpetual condition that conflicts with scientific principles like decay and the conservation of energy. In science, physical processes typically have endpoints and transformations, unlike an unending state of existence suggested in the verse.
Paradox #5
Some people might see a moral conflict in this verse because it describes a scene of judgment and eternal punishment, which can seem harsh or contradictory to the idea of a loving and forgiving God. This might create tension between the themes of mercy and justice in religious teachings.