Contradictions and Paradoxes in Isaiah 7:16

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Isaiah 7:16 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Isaiah 7:16. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Isaiah, before a child is old enough to tell right from wrong, the lands that make people scared will be left by their leaders. This means that God will take care of problems and make sure the bad times will go away.

Isaiah 7:16: For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings.

Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21

This verse mentions that many are the plans in a person's heart, but it is the Lord's purpose that prevails, which may seem to contradict the notion that a child understanding right from wrong signifies a prophetic timeline.

Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.

Contradiction with Romans 8:28

States that all things work together for good to those who love God, potentially contradicting the idea that the age of moral understanding indicates a specific point of intervention.

Romans 8:28: And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.

Contradiction with Jeremiah 10:23

Indicates that it is not in man to direct his steps, which can contrast with the interpretation of a child knowing right from wrong as a definitive event.

Jeremiah 10:23: O LORD, I know that the way of man [is] not in himself: [it is] not in man that walketh to direct his steps.

Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:11

Asserts God has made everything beautiful in its time, diverging from assigning a timeline based on a child's development.

Ecclesiastes 3:11: He hath made every [thing] beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.

Paradox #1

The contradiction or inconsistency in Isaiah 7:16 may arise from differing interpretations of the prophecy surrounding the "young woman" or "virgin" and the child. Some see it as a direct prediction of events in the time of Isaiah, while others interpret it as a prophecy about Jesus' birth. This can lead to debates about whether it is a dual-fulfillment prophecy or pertains only to historical events during Isaiah’s life.

Paradox #2

The potential contradiction with Isaiah 7:16 could be related to the interpretation of the timing and nature of prophetic fulfillment. Some readers might struggle with how this verse ties into the larger context of prophecy regarding signs, particularly in relation to the birth of a child and its fulfillment in both immediate and messianic contexts. Such interpretations can lead to differing views on how prophecies in the Bible are fulfilled.

Paradox #3

Isaiah 7:16 presents a historical inconsistency because it references a child who will grow up during a specific political period involving the kingdoms of Israel and Syria. However, the larger context and timing when this text was written and its application to later events, like those in the New Testament, don't perfectly align, creating confusion about its immediate versus future fulfillment.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.