Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:8
This verse states there is a time for love and hate, a time of war and peace, suggesting anger and conflict have appropriate times.
Ecclesiastes 3:8: A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.
Contradiction with Matthew 21:12-13
Jesus driving out the money changers in the temple illustrates justified anger, seemingly contradicting the disapproval of wrath in James 1:20.
Matthew 21:12-13: And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:26
Advises to be angry and sin not, indicating some anger can be righteous, contrasting the straightforward rejection of wrath in James 1:20.
Ephesians 4:26: Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
Contradiction with Mark 3:5
Jesus looks on others with anger, showing righteous anger is possible, while James 1:20 states anger doesn't lead to righteousness.
Mark 3:5: And when he had looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts, he saith unto the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched [it] out: and his hand was restored whole as the other. [hardness: or, blindness]
Paradox #1
James 1:20 suggests that human anger does not produce righteousness or align with God's will. A potential doctrinal inconsistency might arise when comparing this with instances in the Bible where anger is portrayed positively or as justified, such as God's own expressions of anger or righteous indignation seen in figures like Jesus cleansing the temple. These examples might seem to conflict with the idea that anger cannot lead to righteousness. However, the context is crucial; human anger may not always align with divine purposes or be expressed in a righteous way, whereas divine or righteous anger is seen as just and purposeful.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict could be that the verse emphasizes the importance of controlling anger, implying it's not productive or righteous. However, in some situations, anger might be seen as a justified or necessary response to injustice or wrongdoing. This could lead to a conflict between maintaining calmness and allowing emotions to drive action for change.