Contradiction with Romans 14:5
James 4:17 emphasizes knowing and not doing good is sin, whereas Romans 14:5 suggests personal conviction as a guide, implying that what one person considers right might not apply to another, creating potential conflict in determining what is universally "good."
Romans 14:5: One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day [alike]. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. [fully persuaded: or, fully assured]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 8:9
James 4:17 speaks to the individual’s responsibility to act on known good but 1 Corinthians 8:9 advises using freedom responsibly to prevent another from stumbling, focusing on community rather than personal action.
1 Corinthians 8:9: But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak. [liberty: or, power]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4
James 4:17 suggests inaction on known good is sin, but 1 Timothy 4:4 asserts that what God created is good, hinting that knowledge of good may be self-evident, leaving less leeway for claiming ignorance of good deeds.
1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Contradiction with Galatians 5:13
James 4:17 tasks individuals with action based on known good, while Galatians 5:13 talks about using freedom to serve others in love, suggesting a positive obligation rather than the negative framing of omission.
Galatians 5:13: For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only [use] not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:1
James 4:17 places a moral burden on knowledge and subsequent inaction as sin, Ecclesiastes 3:1, however, highlights a time for everything, suggesting the appropriateness of action can vary, potentially delaying action on known good.
Ecclesiastes 3:1: To every [thing there is] a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
Paradox #1
James 4:17 emphasizes the responsibility of knowing the right thing to do and failing to do it as sinful. A potential theological conflict might arise concerning the nature of sin and accountability, particularly regarding the knowledge of right versus wrong. Some could argue that this places a heavy burden on individuals who may differ in their understanding of what is "right" due to cultural, social, or personal differences, leading to inconsistencies in how sin is perceived and judged among different people or groups.
Paradox #2
The verse highlights the idea that knowing the right thing to do and not doing it is wrong. Some may see a contradiction if compared to other parts of the Bible that emphasize faith over actions, because it suggests moral action is also crucial. However, many believe faith and good deeds support each other rather than conflict.