Contradiction with Isaiah 41:10
Contradicts by promising God’s support and presence, while Jeremiah 12:7 speaks of God forsaking His heritage.
Isaiah 41:10: Fear thou not; for I [am] with thee: be not dismayed; for I [am] thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
Contradicts by affirming God will never leave or forsake His people, unlike Jeremiah 12:7 where He abandons His heritage.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Psalm 94:14
Contradicts by assuring that the Lord will not forsake His people, as opposed to Jeremiah 12:7.
Psalm 94:14: For the LORD will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 31:6
Contradicts with a declaration that God will not fail or forsake His people, unlike Jeremiah 12:7, where He gives up His heritage.
Deuteronomy 31:6: Be strong and of a good courage, fear not, nor be afraid of them: for the LORD thy God, he [it is] that doth go with thee; he will not fail thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Joshua 1:5
Contradicts by affirming that God will not fail or forsake His people, while Jeremiah 12:7 involves forsaking.
Joshua 1:5: There shall not any man be able to stand before thee all the days of thy life: as I was with Moses, [so] I will be with thee: I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with John 14:18
Contradicts with the promise that Jesus will not leave His followers as orphans, unlike the abandonment in Jeremiah 12:7.
John 14:18: I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you. [comfortless: or, orphans]
Paradox #1
Some people might see a conflict with Jeremiah 12:7 in terms of God's promises to protect and bless His chosen people. In this verse, God expresses a form of rejection or abandonment, which might seem inconsistent with His covenant to always be with them. This can raise questions about God's faithfulness or the conditions under which His promises hold.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency in "Jeremiah 12:7" could be related to the different interpretations and historical contexts regarding the relationship between God and His chosen people. Some scholars may point to how the verse reflects God's decision to abandon His people for a time, which might seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible where God promises eternal commitment and protection to them. This tension between divine commitment and punishment could be seen as conflicting within the broader biblical narrative.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 12:7 might present a contradiction or conflict because it appears to show God abandoning or rejecting His own people, which can seem inconsistent with the idea of a loving and faithful God. This might be confusing for some because it raises questions about divine faithfulness and protection.