Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:31
Suggests that an individual can make a new heart and spirit, indicating a change is possible.
Ezekiel 18:31: Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Contradiction with Matthew 19:26
States that with God, all things are possible, suggesting change is possible.
Matthew 19:26: But Jesus beheld [them], and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
Contradiction with Philippians 4:13
Emphasizes that one can do all things through Christ, implying capability for change.
Philippians 4:13: I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 5:17
Asserts that anyone in Christ is a new creation, which implies transformation is possible.
2 Corinthians 5:17: Therefore if any man [be] in Christ, [he is] a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. [he is: or, let him be]
Contradiction with Romans 12:2
Advises not to conform to the world but to be transformed by renewing the mind, implying change is achievable.
Romans 12:2: And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what [is] that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 13:23 talks about the difficulty of changing one's nature or habits. Some might see a contradiction with other Bible teachings that emphasize personal transformation and change through faith and divine intervention. If change is so difficult, it might seem at odds with messages of hope and redemption.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 13:23 could be seen as presenting a challenge regarding the idea of change and transformation. This verse suggests that some things cannot change, which might conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize the potential for personal transformation and spiritual renewal, such as the idea that faith and God's power can lead to significant change in a person's life.
Paradox #3
This verse uses a metaphor about whether people can change their inherent nature. The potential contradiction or conflict is with the broader biblical theme of transformation and redemption, wherein individuals are often shown as capable of change through divine intervention or personal repentance. This can seem inconsistent with the idea that certain traits or behaviors are unchangeable.
Paradox #4
The scientific inconsistency with Jeremiah 13:23 might relate to the idea that physical traits or characteristics, like the skin color of a person or spots on an animal, cannot be changed naturally or by sheer will. In biology, these traits are determined by genetics and evolutionary mechanisms, not personal effort or decision. The verse uses this idea metaphorically to discuss human behavior, but scientifically, it implies a misunderstanding of how physical traits work.
Paradox #5
The potential moral conflict in this verse could be the idea of inherent nature and whether people can truly change who they are. It suggests that certain traits or behaviors are deeply ingrained and might imply that people cannot change their ways, which can be at odds with the broader biblical message of redemption and transformation.