Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
This verse states that God will never leave nor forsake His people, whereas Jeremiah 14:8 expresses a sentiment of God being like a stranger in the land.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:6
This verse encourages seeking the Lord while He may be found, suggesting accessibility, unlike in Jeremiah 14:8 where God seems distant.
Isaiah 55:6: Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:
Contradiction with Psalm 46:1
This verse describes God as an ever-present help in trouble, which differs from the feeling of God's absence in Jeremiah 14:8.
Psalm 46:1: [To the chief Musician for the sons of Korah, A Song upon Alamoth.] God [is] our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. [for: or, of]
Contradiction with Matthew 28:20
In this verse, Jesus promises to be with believers always, contrasting with the sense of God's temporary presence in Jeremiah 14:8.
Matthew 28:20: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.
Paradox #1
The verse in Jeremiah 14:8 might seem to show a contradiction by depicting God as a stranger or someone passing by, which could conflict with the belief that God is always present and intimately involved with His people. This could raise questions about God's nature and level of involvement in human affairs.
Paradox #2
The doctrinal issue with Jeremiah 14:8 could be related to the portrayal of God as distant or indifferent during times of trouble, which might seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize God's constant presence and care for His people. This can create confusion about God's character and His relationship with humanity.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict might arise from the perception of God's role and responsiveness. In this verse, God is described as a savior and yet seems distant or indifferent to the plight of the people. This could be seen as contradictory to the expectation of a consistently present and active divine protector.