Contradiction with Matthew 6:26
Emphasizes God's care for all His creatures, contradicting the destructive nature of Jeremiah 15:3.
Matthew 6:26: Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Describes God as love, conflicting with the actions of punishment in Jeremiah 15:3.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with James 1:17
Describes God as the source of good and perfect gifts, contrasting with the judgment in Jeremiah 15:3.
James 1:17: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Contradiction with Psalm 145:9
States God is good to all, which contrasts the severe judgment in Jeremiah 15:3.
Psalm 145:9: The LORD [is] good to all: and his tender mercies [are] over all his works.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
Declares God takes no pleasure in the death of anyone, opposing the destructive decree in Jeremiah 15:3.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 15:3 describes a situation where multiple forms of destruction are used against a group of people, often seen as actions taken by God. The potential theological conflict might arise when people question how a loving and merciful God can act in such a harsh and destructive manner. This tension between divine justice and mercy can be difficult for some to reconcile.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 15:3 describes God sending four kinds of destroyers. Some people might see a contradiction when comparing this with other biblical teachings about God's love, kindness, and mercy. It can be difficult for some to reconcile the destructive actions with a loving and merciful God. However, in the broader biblical context, actions like this are often understood as justice or consequences for wrongdoing, rather than a conflict with God's loving nature. Overall, interpretations vary, and some may see it as more about justice rather than a doctrinal inconsistency.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 15:3 describes various forms of destruction and punishment. A contradiction could arise if one interpreted this verse literally implying that specific natural elements or animals act with purpose or intent. In science, natural events and animal behaviors are understood as processes explained by natural laws and instincts rather than deliberate actions guided by a higher power. Therefore, inconsistency could occur if attempting to reconcile these aspects with scientific explanations of cause and effect in nature.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse might stem from the depiction of divine punishment using severe means, which could clash with ideas of a loving and forgiving God. It raises questions about justice and mercy.