Contradiction with Psalm 146:3
This verse instructs not to put trust in princes, similar in its caution, but supports reliance on God, reinforcing rather than contradicting Jeremiah 17:5.
Psalm 146:3: Put not your trust in princes, [nor] in the son of man, in whom [there is] no help. [help: or, salvation]
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5
Encourages trust in the Lord, aligning with the spirit of Jeremiah 17:5 rather than contradicting it.
Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 17:5 could be seen as conflicting with the idea that humans can trust one another and form reliable relationships. Some people might see this as contradicting teachings that emphasize love, community, and supporting each other, as found in other parts of the Bible. However, this typically highlights a different aspect of wisdom in relying on faith and not undermining the value of human relationships.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 17:5 says that relying on humans instead of God brings problems. Some people might see a conflict with this idea and the concept of community and fellowship in Christianity, where believers are encouraged to support each other. While trusting God is important, the Bible also highlights the value of relationships and working together, which can seem inconsistent.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 17:5 focuses on the dangers of relying on humans instead of God for strength. A contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing this with other biblical texts that emphasize the importance of community and human relationships, like Ecclesiastes 4:9-12, which highlights the strength found in companionship and support from others. This could appear inconsistent as one text cautions against relying on humans, while another encourages finding strength in human connections.
Paradox #4
The contradiction could be in the message about relying on human strength versus divine support. Some might argue that valuing self-reliance and using one's own judgment in life can be morally positive, while the verse suggests that relying on humans is negative. This could conflict with the idea of human agency and responsibility.