Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:3
While Jeremiah 19:10 speaks of breaking a bottle as a symbol of destruction, Ecclesiastes 3:3 acknowledges there is "a time to break down, and a time to build up," suggesting a balance between breaking and building rather than solely destruction.
Ecclesiastes 3:3: A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up;
Contradiction with Isaiah 54:10
Jeremiah 19:10 describes breaking a bottle to demonstrate irrevocable destruction, whereas Isaiah 54:10 emphasizes God's everlasting kindness and peace, suggesting ultimate endurance and stability.
Isaiah 54:10: For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but my kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the covenant of my peace be removed, saith the LORD that hath mercy on thee.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Jeremiah 19:10 symbolizes the destruction associated with breaking, while Matthew 5:9 promotes peacemaking, representing harmony and reconciliation instead of destruction.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 19:10 involves God's directive to break a jar as a symbolic act. The contradiction could come from the idea of God commanding destructive actions, which may seem inconsistent with the teachings about love, kindness, and mercy found elsewhere in religious texts. This could be viewed as a conflict between justice and compassion.