Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Jeremiah 19:7 discusses destruction, whereas Matthew 5:9 promotes peacemaking.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
Jeremiah 19:7 speaks of calamity, whereas Jeremiah 29:11 promises hope and prosperity.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with James 3:17
Jeremiah 19:7 foresees conflict, whereas James 3:17 describes wisdom as peaceable and gentle.
James 3:17: But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and] easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. [partiality: or, wrangling]
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 19:7 might raise questions about how a loving and just God could allow or cause suffering or destruction. This could seem inconsistent with the belief that God is compassionate and merciful. It can be challenging to reconcile the ideas of divine punishment with those of love and forgiveness.
Paradox #2
The content of the verse in Jeremiah 19:7 involves themes of defeat and destruction, specifically involving military conflict and its consequences. If one examines these events as literal divine intervention or prophecy, they might conflict with scientific understanding, which does not accommodate supernatural causes for events. Science explains such historical events through socio-political and economic factors, not through divine prophecy.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in this verse might arise from the notion of a loving and just God taking actions that lead to destruction and ruin. This could be seen as conflicting with the idea of compassion and forgiveness. It's the tension between justice and mercy, where severe punishment seems harsh.