Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse commands "Thou shalt not kill," contradicting Jeremiah 19:9 where acts of eating human flesh are foretold as a consequence of siege.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
This verse instructs to love thy neighbor as thyself, which contradicts the acts described in Jeremiah 19:9.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 5:17
This repeats the commandment "Thou shalt not kill," conflicting with the violence depicted in Jeremiah 19:9.
Deuteronomy 5:17: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Romans 12:21
Encourages overcoming evil with good, contradicting the dire consequences of evil described in Jeremiah 19:9.
Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:14
Stresses that all law is fulfilled in love, opposing the horrific events in Jeremiah 19:9.
Galatians 5:14: For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Contradiction with Matthew 22:39
Emphasizes loving your neighbor, conflicting with the extreme desperation in Jeremiah 19:9.
Matthew 22:39: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Paradox #1
The verse could be seen as conflicting with the idea of a loving and compassionate God. It describes a situation of extreme violence and desperation that raises questions about divine justice and mercy. Some might find it hard to reconcile such harsh imagery with the view of God as purely benevolent.
Paradox #2
The verse in question describes an act of extreme desperation, which can seem to conflict with the overall message of love, compassion, and moral behavior emphasized in other parts of the Bible. This contrast may create tension or appear inconsistent with teachings that promote mercy and kindness.
Paradox #3
Jeremiah 19:9 describes a scenario that is very grim and unsettling, involving acts of extreme desperation. Historically, this could be seen as conflicting with the idea of a compassionate and just God, which is a theme in other parts of the Bible. Such a severe punishment might seem inconsistent with messages of mercy and forgiveness emphasized elsewhere in the scriptures.
Paradox #4
Jeremiah 19:9 mentions an act that contradicts fundamental human ethics and biology, as it describes a scenario where people resort to extreme measures for survival. This could be inconsistent with scientific understanding of human behavior and ethics, as it portrays an extreme response not commonly supported by historical or anthropological evidence of human communities under stress.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in that verse arises from its depiction of extreme actions that contrast with broader moral teachings about compassion and value for life. It might be seen as conflicting with the overall message of love and mercy found in other parts of religious teachings.