Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
While Jeremiah 20:8 speaks of lament and reproach due to speaking, Proverbs 15:1 suggests that a gentle answer can turn away wrath, implying that speech doesn't always lead to negative outcomes.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:7
Jeremiah 20:8 recounts a time to speak that leads to reproach, whereas Ecclesiastes 3:7 acknowledges there is a time to keep silence, suggesting discretion in speaking.
Ecclesiastes 3:7: A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
Contradiction with Proverbs 18:21
Jeremiah 20:8 describes speech leading to negative consequences, while Proverbs 18:21 highlights that the tongue has the power of life and death, suggesting speech can also bring life.
Proverbs 18:21: Death and life [are] in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.
Contradiction with James 3:6
Jeremiah 20:8 focuses on the consequence of his words causing reproach, whereas James 3:6 emphasizes the destructive power of the tongue, suggesting that Jeremiah’s plight is a particular outcome of a broader truth.
James 3:6: And the tongue [is] a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell. [course: Gr. wheel]
Paradox #1
Jeremiah 20:8 might appear to conflict with the general message of hope and faith in God's plan found throughout the Bible. In this verse, Jeremiah expresses deep frustration and despair about his prophetic role, which seems to contradict the encouragement to trust and find strength in God during difficult times. His complaint could be seen as inconsistent with the idea that serving God should bring peace and fulfillment.
Paradox #2
Jeremiah 20:8 expresses feelings of distress and lament over the negative consequences of delivering God's message, highlighting a personal struggle. The moral conflict could arise from the tension between the obligation to speak the truth, despite it bringing suffering or ridicule, and the desire for peace and acceptance. This can create an internal conflict between fulfilling one's duty and seeking personal comfort or safety.