Contradiction with James 1:5
Whereas Jeremiah 29:32 speaks of punishment and lack of support from God, James 1:5 emphasizes God’s willingness to give wisdom generously to anyone who asks.
James 1:5: If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all [men] liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.
Contradiction with Jonah 3:10
Jeremiah 29:32 deals with inevitable punishment, but Jonah 3:10 highlights how God can change His mind and withhold punishment if people repent.
Jonah 3:10: And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did [it] not.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
Jeremiah 29:32 foretells death, but Ezekiel 18:32 expresses that God takes no pleasure in anyone’s death, implying that He prefers people to repent and live.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Contradiction with 1 John 1:9
Jeremiah 29:32 states the certainty of punishment, while 1 John 1:9 assures believers that if we confess our sins, God will forgive us, contrasting inevitable judgment with the promise of forgiveness.
1 John 1:9: If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 7:14
Although Jeremiah 29:32 predicts punishment, 2 Chronicles 7:14 offers hope that divine wrath can be averted if the people humble themselves, pray, seek God's face, and turn from their wicked ways.
2 Chronicles 7:14: If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land. [which...: Heb. upon whom my name is called]
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction in Jeremiah 29:32 might be the idea of collective punishment—punishing a person and their descendants for the actions of the individual. This can conflict with the modern belief in individual responsibility, where only the person who does wrong should face consequences.